Tuesday, October 14, 2014

White House Weekly Address: More on the Minimum Wage

In his most recent, Weekly Address, President Barack Obama continued to congratulate his administration for economic recovery and call for a raise in the federal minimum wage.






And he peddles the same issues that he alleges will improve upon the recovery: rebuilding our transportation infrastructure, insuring fair pay for women (i.e.--paying them by some other standard than the market demand for their skills, and restructuring student loans.



"That’s why I’m going to keep pushing policies that will create more jobs faster and raise wages faster – policies like rebuilding our infrastructure, making sure women are paid fairly, and making it easier for young people to pay off their student loans."

The President's primary agenda, however, is securing a raise in the federal minimum wage.  He wants Americans to ask themselves the following question:

"Ask yourself: could you live on $14,500 a year?  That’s what someone working full-time on the minimum wage makes.  If they’re raising kids, that’s below the poverty line."

Of course, the vast majority of federal minimum wage earners are not full timers attempting the raise a family; they are part timers working to help pay bills or earn some extra spending money.

He follows with the obligatory moral judgment:


 "And that’s not right.  A hard day’s work deserves a fair day’s pay."

That's just political rhetoric. Of course a hard day's work deserves a fair day's pay. But who decides what is fair? The President? The employer thought the wage was fair because that was offered based upon the new hire's education and skills. The part timer earning minimum wage apparently thought the wage fair, since he contracted to accept that wage. . And many people receive a "fair day's pay" even when they have not worked especially hard at all. 


"It also means they’ll have more money to spend at local businesses – which grows the economy for everyone."

It does meant that. But it also means those local business might be paying our higher wages and charging higher prices. That is not growing the economy. That is inflation.


"That’s why, since the first time I asked Congress to give America a raise, 13 states, 21 cities and D.C. have gone around Congress to raise their workers’ wages.  Five more states have minimum wage initiatives on the ballot next month.  More companies are choosing to raise their workers’ wages.  A recent survey shows that a majority of small business owners support a gradual increase to ten-ten an hour, too.  And I’ve done what I can on my own by requiring federal contractors to pay their workers at least ten-ten an hour."

And this it how is should be done private businesses and local jurisdictions determining what is a "fair wage." Labor markets and costs of living differ significantly between states and regions.

And finally this:

 "Because America deserves a raise right now.  And America should forever be a place where your hard work is rewarded."

Again, the President seems clueless that Americans receive wages all the time. Although may people start out at the federal minimum wage, few stay there. Hard work not only should be rewarded, it almost always is rewarded.

Government bureaucracies are not the only ones that take care of employees.



Sunday, September 14, 2014

Media Muddle-Mindedness and Western ISIS Fighters

Western news agencies and Western politicians continue to warn the public about the shocking stream of people from Europe, Australia, Canada, and the United States flowing to Syria to join ISIS. Their alarm maybe an uncertain trumpet, or at least one severely out of tune.

Articles by Western media will note the numbers of "British citizens" or "Canadian citizens" etc. who have left for Syria. These articles often subsequently describe these people as "Westerners." It is a serious confusion of terminology, however, to conflate "citizens" of Western countries with "Westerners." The vast majority of these so-called "Westerners" are Muslims who have immigrated to Europe or North America in pursuit of economic advancement. They may even have become citizens. But many have never assimilated to a meaningful degree into Western liberal, secular culture and its moral relativity. Now they return to the Syria to fight under the illusion of moral and religious certitude represented by ISIS.

The two most egregious articles are here and here. In the first, a so-called "Glasgow girl" from Scotland left her friends and family for Syria. Readers of this headline were no doubt bewildered unless they read beyond the sensationalist headline to learn her name is  Aqsa Mahmood and her family immigrated to Scotland from the world's largest insane asylum commonly known as Pakistan.  In the second, a couple of Austrian girls named Samra Kesinovic and Sabina Selimovic left for Syria. Though described as Austrian, they immigrated to Austria from Iraq. 




                                          Samra and Sabina--which is which? It does not matter. 
                                          If their experience is like that of other "Western" ISIS fighters, 
                                          they will be dead and forgotten in a matter of weeks.
                                           


Thousands of Muslim immigrants have immigrated to Europe and North America over the last couple of decades and many of them refuse to assimilate into a Western culture dramatically different from that from which they came. We see this manifested everyday on  internet news sites when Muslim immigrants demand the same Sharia law and religious practices that have made their homelands such a cultural backwater. How could  anyone but a journalist be surprised that hundreds return home to fight for the ISIS illusion?


Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Impotent Islamists

While media pundits sound the alarm about ISIS and imminent attacks on the United States, ISIS "spokesmen" play upon such fears with cruel and gruesome videos of the beheadings of two American journalists--James Foley and Steven Sotloff. These videos features narratives threatening harm to American and calling out President Obama by name--as if the narrator enjoys some kind of parity with the President of the United States.

From the first video:

"This is James Wright Foley, an American citizen of your country. As a government you have been at the forefront of the aggression towards the Islamic State. You have plotted against us and gone far out of your way to find reasons to interfere in our affairs. Today, your military air force is attacking us daily in Iraq. 

"Your strikes have caused casualties amongst Muslims. You are no longer fighting an insurgency.

"We are an Islamic army and a state that has been accepted by a large number of Muslims worldwide.

"So any attempt by you, Obama, to deny the Muslims their rights of living in safety under the Islamic Caliphate will result in the bloodshed of your people."

“The life of this American citizen, Obama, depends on your next decision."



From the second video:


“I’m back, Obama, and I’m back because of your arrogant foreign policy towards the Islamic 

State, because of your insistence on continuing your bombings and [unclear] on Mosul Dam, despite our serious warnings. You, Obama, have but to gain from your actions but another American citizen. So just as your missiles continue to strike our people, our knife will continue to strike the necks of your people…


We take this opportunity to warn those governments that enter this evil alliance of America against the Islamic State to back off and leave our people alone.”

Although cruel and gruesome, these executions simply expose these burqa wearing Bedouins as impotent, frustrated, dreamers living in the past. Centuries have passed since the idea of a caliphate evoked the least bit fear among rational people in the West. Taking hostages and murdering unarmed journalists hardly constitute some kind of existential threat. They are the actions of the weak and impotent.

Unfortunately some media pundits apparently believe that cutting the throat of  unarmed American citizens means that ISIS will soon make good their boast of hoisting their flag at the White House.


Meanwhile, other influential people seek instill fear of ISIS among Americans. In a recent  interview, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia warns that ISIS could hit Europe or the United States in two months. As an assessment of the military capabilities of ISIS, this is as speculative as any judgement that I myself have made. As a propaganda piece, this interview is slick. He seeks to draw the United States back into the Middle East to fight for the interests of Saudi Arabia.

 As custodian of Islamic holy sites and the birthplace of Islam, Saudi Arabia claims the leadership of the Islamic world. ISIS poses a direct threat to that leadership through its aim of creating a caliphate uniting as many Arabs as possible under one ruling authority. They possess billions of dollars of United States weaponry, yet they refuse to fight.

 Why not?

They know that the United States will do their fighting for them and suffer all the negative consequences of intervention in the Middle East. They will remain silent, of course, and publicly unsupportive of whatever actions we take.

With all his armaments, King Abdullah should send forth a fearsome "roar" as the lion of the Arabian peninsula that he claims to be. Instead, all we hear is a plaintive "mew."






                          King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia

Monday, August 25, 2014

Folly in Ferguson

The unfolding of events the last week or so in Ferguson, Missouri evoke that Deja Vu phenomenon of "we have all been here before."

An unarmed black teen,Michael Brown, is shot to death by a white police officer named Darren Wilson..

Although only a few people know the facts--and even then only partially--everyone spreads the "word on the street." Or words--because of the competing versions of what happened. Wilson shot Brown in the back while running away. Wilson shot Brown in the back four times and then walked up to put put four more bullets in him while he lay prostrate on the ground. Wilson shot Brown as he tried to surrender with his arms raised.

Whatever the version of events, the people who hear the stories experience confirmation bias--they accept only that information that confirms their worst suspicions. And this is reinforced by a phenomenon known as social proof or group think--bringing one's beliefs in conformity with those around you.

Then the manipulation of (or by?) the mainstream media begins. Supporters of Brown provide a flattering photo of Brown as a high school graduate and future college student.




He is remembered as a "Gentle Giant."

Local residents organize protests calling for justice. They create a symbol for the event--in this case, hands raised. Others outside Ferguson embrace the narrative--and the symbol.


                                          Howard University Students: We are Michael Brown




Meanwhile, other residents of Ferguson seek justice of another sort. (H/T Conservative Treehouse)

Suspecting that the local QuikTrip called the police about an alleged theft by Brown, they loot and burn it.




They spray paint a message on the side of the QuikTrip.




Then when they learn--oops--that Ferguson's Market called the police, they loot and burn it.








The police department, of course, will say nothing. It will be conducting an internal investigation. It will interview the police officer, review any security video, and interview any witnesses. It will brush aside media requests for information because they are in the process of conducting that investigation.

Without any competing narrative, too many people in Ferguson (and elsewhere) remained convinced that their version of events it true. The demand for blood justice lead to overcharging. Overcharging leads to acquittal. Acquittal leads to frustration, anger, and even violence.


And then it will happen all over in another town after another shooting.

Monday, August 11, 2014

The Emasculated Muslim

Headlines the last few weeks have expressed alarm over the progress of a militant Islamic group calling themselves ISIS, the Islamic State In Iraq and Syria.  Summary executions, beheadings, and even crucifixions mark the path of their destructive march that they hope will reach Baghdad. 





With Baghdad still beyond their reach, they already issue threats against the United States. At the 4:40 mark of the video, ISIS spokesman Abu Mosa makes clear the ambitions of ISIS:

“I say to America that the Islamic Caliphate has been established. Don’t be cowards and attack us with drones. Instead send your soldiers, the ones we humiliated in Iraq. We will humiliate them everywhere, God willing, and we will raise the flag of Allah in the White House.” 

The aspirations to resurrect the Caliphate manifest romantic notions about Islam's past, when it motivated Arabs to pour out of the Arabian peninsula for a remarkable series of conquests that reached from Spain in the West to India in the East. And silly pundits on television tremble in fear at the mention of "caliphate."

The Arabs established the Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad in the 8th century. The Abbasid caliphate ruled the Middle East from Baghdad between 750 to 1258 AD--until the arrival of the steppe peoples. Various tribes of Turks established themselves in the Middle East, displacing the Arabs in Asia Minor. Domination by the Turks may have been bearable because the Turks actually converted to Islam. The Mongols under Jenghiz Khan, however,  did not convert. They overwhelmed Arab armies, captured Baghdad in 1258 and slaughtered the ruling family. The caliphate of Baghdad was no more.

The Turks, however, expanded their control over the Arab world and continued to dominate the Middle East until World War I. The Arab Muslims only regained their independence after armies from the West defeated the Turks in the war.

 Despite their independence and the enormous wealth provided by their oil reserves, the Arab Muslims remain somewhat of a backwater, not quite in the "Third World" but certainly bypassed by the the modern world. They cannot even impose their will upon Israel, whose social and technological sophistication derived from their modern European cultural foundation make them formidable opponents. 

They have been emasculated by modernity.

While most Arabs content themselves with the basics of work and family and are not especially bothered by the Islamic world's impotence, a small percentage find themselves enraged by it all. And they romanticize about the glories of caliphates past and fantasize about the conquest of that symbol of Western power and domination--the United States. 

Their boast reveal their ignorance. ISIS spokesman Abu Mosa, surrounded by sword bearing fighters for Allah,  challenges the United States to find man to man without the drones. The basic theme running through changing military technology is increasing the distance between your soldiers and the enemy combatants so that they can kill without themselves being killed--from bows, to gunpowder, to planes, to ICBMs.

ISIS wants to pretend that the last 14 centuries never happened. 


Sunday, August 10, 2014

Skipping School

Another area in which Americans seem to be detaching themselves from experiences they share in common is the public school system.

Of course, some of my conservative friends call them government schools--a name with a pejorative connotation in this era when the public holds such a low opinion of the government and the elected (and appointed) officials that operate it.

This original name was common schools,  because states established them for everyone to attend. Before the advent of the common school, most children received a rudimentary education at home and from local tutors. Wealthier people hired private tutors to live in the home and teach the children or helped to establish quasi-public schools funded primarily through tuition. Many ministers organized schools, especially to train future ministers. And some states had charity schools to provide at least some education to those children who could not afford tuition. These schools taught learning, Protestant piety,

States created common school for everyone to attend, regardless of wealth. Financed chiefly state expenditures, the common schools developed as part of a system from grade school to state colleges. By the mid-nineteenth century, most medium sized towns and cities could boast of a "Central High School," that drew children from all areas of the city.

Over the past fifty years, however, Americans  have expressed their dissatisfaction with the schools by leaving them. Wealthier Americans acted first, created private college prep days schools to provide their children an edge. Admittedly small in numbers, they perceive that common schools with mandatory attendance inevitably leads to lowered academic standards. (The exit parallels their exclusiveness in other areas as well. Planned residential communities of our modern era separate families by income. And some segregate themselves in public entertainments--a luxury box at the football stadium with smoked salmon and champagne provides escape from mixing with the hoi polloi and their hot dogs, nachos, and beer.)

Court ordered  integration led to an exodus into so-called segregationist academies. Court ordered bans on organized prayer and the decline of school attention to teaching moral virtue has led to the formation of Christian day schools. It is more than just a matter of educational quality. Even school systems with achievement levels that far exceed those of other systems find dozens of private schools in their midst.

One of the newest trends is home schooling. Many Americans, either for financial reasons or ideological ones, have withdrawn even from private education--choosing to keep their children at home. This has given rise to a cottage industry for providing educational materials for home schooling parents and conventions where homeschooling parents meet to exchange ideas and materials and see presentations by home school curriculum developers.

Now sure about "The meaning of it all."












Friday, August 8, 2014

The Retreat to Privacy at Poolside

Our shrinking civic life seems to include the non-political aspects of sociability as well.

When I lived my childhood in Miami, the beaches served as the primary swimming venue. We did not learn to swim, however, at the beach. We learned to swim at  county parks and recreation pools.  And in several cities where I have lived the only place most people could swim was at the city or county pool.

Over the years, as my parents became more affluent, we lived in neighborhoods that boasted of pools for the exclusive use of the homeowners. If I remember accurately, my friends and I spent at least part of every summer day at the neighborhood pool. Dozens of kids swarmed all over the grounds, either swimming or enjoying the playground equipment. I never much thought about it before, but I guess the attraction of a neighborhood pool was its convenience and  the escape it provided from swimming with strangers from another part of town. A bit of privacy if you will.

Now I own a home in a neighborhood with a pool. On my days off from work I will spend an hour or so taking in the sun and swimming for a few minutes. I usually make my way down early in the morning before the space gets too crowded and the day gets too hot. Early in the morning I share the pool with some older women swimming in their burqas accompanied with their grand kids. I have made it down to the pool in the afternoon, but the state of affairs becomes much hotter in a number of ways. The afternoon temperatures make even the poolside much too unbearable for this fifty-something year old man. In addition, the handful of neighborhood college girls make their way down to the pool by then, turning up the temperature in a manner of speaking. (I still ponder how to react. At my age is appreciating a college girl stretched out on a chaise lounge an "innocent pleasure of life" thing? Or is it a "creepy old man thing?"

A couple of observations along the way. First, my neighborhood pool never attracts the number of kids that the pool of my childhood. Do kids today have other interests? Do they instead play video games about swimming, manipulating their third level gnome through a gauntlet of swimmers, rafts, and noodles to some confrontation with "the boss"--the lifeguard?

Second, and more to the point of this post, I notice the number of neighbors who have dropped $30,000 or more to put a pool in their backyard. I can stand on my front porch and point  to six neighbors with concrete dug-in pools in their back yard. They seek privacy not only from the strangers that they encounter at a city pool, but also from their closest neighbors.




Its my neighborhood pool on the internet!